gement: (Default)
I'm in the last stages of deciding to upgrade to a smartphone. Due to having a legacy plan with a lot of minutes and them also having a cheaper family option, I'm sticking with T-Mobile. (Yes, yes, I know they just got bought.)

It looks like My Phone is the LG Optimus Prime T, described by places like CNet as a solid and excellent starter smartphone. As I don't intend to take HD video and can't be bothered to upload the pictures I already take, that sounds about perfect.

The other selling point is that it's light, as in slightly lighter than an iPhone when most Android phones seem to be heavier. I use my phone as a phone. Like holding it up to my ear. I have enough neck and shoulder problems without having a phone that weighs almost half a pound.

So, last sanity check, has anyone got a warning about the LG Optimus T or a better phone T Mobile can sell me for <$60 (with contract)?

Now that we're done with the boring bit, my friend Max made an entertaining logical leap regarding my writing the other day. I compared vampire misbehavior with the way our cat, Bamf, will start prowling around killing the toy mice extra hard when her human isn't home. Bored, petulant, and just needs to give something small and tasty a good swat and neck-breaking shake.

Max says, "I can see it now..." and describes the following:

[SCENE: DRAWING ROOM, EARLY EVENING, with LORD ALDO, a vampire, and LORD TWITTERLY, a human friend, sitting and conversing. They have clearly been talking for some time.]

TWIT: So, I was just thinking that... Aldo?

ALDO (staring intently out the window): Sss.

TWIT (lowering his voice): Aldo, are you all right? What is it?

ALDO (head ducking, starting to crouch in his chair a bit): There's a bird.

TWIT (relaxes): Ah, so there is! How lovely!

ALDO: I could get it.

TWIT: Uh. Sure. We can open the window and shoot it. That will be fun.

ALDO: Nuh-no. I could get it.

TWIT: Ah. I see. [Backing out of the room.] You... have fun with that, then.

[ALDO is prowling out of his chair and starting to do the little pre-pounce butt wiggle thing. He has neglected to open the window.]
gement: (Default)
Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] memegarden's kind gift, I went to 826 Seattle's Write Like I Do last night, this month being a two hour workshop on historical writing. (The series is aimed at adults, with proceeds used as a fundraiser for the youth programs.)

The guest author was Elizabeth Kostova, described in the ad as the author of the new book, The Swan Thieves. Whatever. I hadn't heard of either. When I arrived for the workshop, there were two heaps of books. The larger was for The Swan Thieves. The smaller was for...

The Historian, a book that's been OMGOMGOMG at the top of my unread reading list for two years. The exhaustively researched doorstop that's a vampire mystery ranging across three historical eras and heavy into Romania. Oh, that Elizabeth Kostova. Oh my.

So I blew my play money for the month getting signed copies of her work, and had an awesome workshop, in which I got to stand up and say, "I'm M_____ and I write 18th century vampire stuff, so I really need to be here." When she singled me out later as the only person who confessed to already writing historicals and asked me what drew me to the setting, I said, "Bluntly? The clothes." Which gave more people permission to talk about liking the glamor of an era instead of all serious social issues.

She was a great workshop leader. Everything was well timed, she kept us on-schedule and made sure people got fair chances to talk, and was unilaterally supportive of whatever we said we were interested in writing. She stayed a half hour after the official closing time answering questions about the writing and publishing process, as did her agent. I had a spectacular night.

I also made a buddy, the other person there half an hour early who also prefers LJ as a primary form of social communication! Yay! Hi, [livejournal.com profile] mimerki! (Edit: Oh, you call me lovely in your journal! Yes, you're lovely too.)


New prompt generator: "Crushed aardvark falls regarding a biscuit."

Using less than standard U.S. definitions of "biscuit", "regarding", and "fall". And wishing I'd thought longer about how to draw a chocolate chip cookie with the same perspective as the rest of the picture. For the record, anvils are surprisingly hard to draw. But I'm proud of the contract, and of the aardvark paws.

The new generator isn't filtered for drawable concepts, so I have to refresh more often, but it includes phrase, sentence, and paragraph options for more randomtastic flexibility.
gement: (Default)
This is why I can write:



I am totally serious here. I would not have even picked up my pen if I thought my writing would appeal to anyone else, because then I'd have to meet that person's expectations. Learning that I was completely wrong has been, while nerve-wracking, a pleasant surprise. But I had to start by writing for nothing but my own memory.
gement: (Default)
Writing group went well last night, and we got to critique what turned out to be a surprisingly enjoyable and complex story.

Then I went home, found tasty chewy author-snacks of my own, and stayed up too late doing the Pronounification editing pass to keep ahead of my lovely and methodical reader. (It's a bit like laying cartoon train tracks.)

This morning I had a terribly entertaining dream in which I was sitting at the writing group's round table, in the Hub. (Yes, the Torchwood Hub.) My critiquers were an anonymous female labelled "fanfiction author", very earnest and sitting forward in her chair, and Jack Harkness, sprawling back in his. They had both read through a large chunk of my work without making detailed critiques so we could discuss the big picture.

Fanfic author was complaining because I had ended some scenes before they actually got into detailed sex. I said, "Well, sometimes it just didn't call for it. I mean, I've written my share of NC-17. I'm not squeamish. But sometimes the rhythm of the story works better without going into that part."

Jack nodded, obviously in agreement but not interested in expanding on the topic. Fanfic author still looked dissatisfied with a shade of disappointed.

I hate leaving people unappeased. I said, "Mind you, if there's something you specifically wanted, I do take requests."

Jack turned on The Grin. I was startled by my mind's ability to call up that expression, which it can't do when I'm awake. I also had no idea my breath could come up short in dreams. "Is that so."

"In writing," I added.

No, that was not an unambiguous statement. I let it hang. I could see him debating the best timing on scribbling down an extremely inappropriate request.

Fanfic author cleared her throat. "Let's stay on topic here."

I thought, You're just jealous, but I didn't feel too smug or anything. (It's not like he wouldn't go after her next week.) Then the sexual tension woke me up. Gnyargh.
gement: (Default)
I survived the hot seat at the No Safewords Writers Group on Monday night! Two hours of just talking about 18 pages of my work (by which I mean manuscript formatted pages, so more like 20 pages of a paperback than 20 pages of academic writing). I have a blind spot where I take the last feedback I heard as gospel, so I'm writing this down here so the next time someone gives me TOTALLY OPPOSITE advice I can triangulate.

Any of you who are reading my work and would like to jump over to this story to read, comment, kibitz, etc. before having your opinions colored by the group's feedback... Look for "Bait and Hook" under the heading Playing House. It doesn't include any spoilers or require any background past Mark. Don't read it at work. Trust me.

The work-safe but not necessarily interesting-to-you details of what I got out of the group feedback. )

In other news, my opening story SUCKS as a representation of the whole. I am chained to certain aspects of it in the way they define character meetings and provide a couple of very specific emotional ingredients.

But it's a saga of romance and hot M/M action, and the first section has... um... no romance and no action unless you count platonic respectful bondage for plot reasons. Which, y'know, I find hot (hence having written it), but I wouldn't expect the rest of it from the first, or vice versa.

Since the relationship necessarily develops, I can't really start with romance, though the first splash scene is currently a heated conversation between the appropriate people, so that might count. But then it slooooooows down. I just want to cut the damned thing out, but it anchors the rest.

I had the brilliant idea of making the second scene something implicitly if not explicitly sexy, and then I'm still left with the frickin' frackin' interminable camping trip of doooom staring me in the face and standing between me and the rest of the plot.

It's the first thing I wrote. It's clumsy. It requires more plot exposition and a larger cast list than the next 200 pages put together, and then it is discarded as soon as it is over. It has POV problems: In later sections I crawl around in people's heads, while the first story is in distant omniscient because close third-person would be too personal. I've tried rewriting in different perspectives, and it dies on the vine.

My instinct is to somehow throw it away and pretend I haven't written it, and start from scratch on that entire bit, see what comes out. I don't know how to do that. It's canon in my head and I don't know how to scratch it and start fresh, and there are POV problems to deal with, and...

It's a millstone, I tell you, a millstone. Any suggestions on how to deal with this?
gement: (Default)
Me: I was thinking of folding some laundry.

J: Well, there's laundry in the drier.

Me: There's laundry over there. [We have several clean but unfolded baskets in our room at the moment.]

J: (in a sing-song) There's laundry in the attic, and there's laundry on the stair.

Me: I don't know that song.

J: That's because I just made it up.
Ohhh, there's laundry in the drier and there's laundry over there,
There's laundry in the attic, and there's laundry on the stair...
I don't know the rest.

Yesterday, debriefing after watching Flash Gordon, I was talking, awestruck, about the various sexy plot archetypes presented without any whitewash in the movie.

J: And, of course, the thinly veiled homoeroticism of "Sticking our arms into things with Timothy Dalton."
Me: ... Yes. Exactly.

By the way, I am now awestruck that I have never heard Barbarella and Flash Gordon mentioned in the same breath, since they're the differently gendered flavors of the same movie.

I like that movie very much, and it seems like a weirdly well-kept secret. I've heard Barbarella was 'camp' for years. No one ever told me 'camp' meant 'every brazen sex and heroism cliche rolled into an hour and a half.' Every one. I blushed like crazy.

It makes me want to cast my pen aside in shame and despair for writing both too much and too little, though. If I'm going to write straight out of the Id, why can't I be as shameless as Flash Gordon, nobly executed, and Barbarella, trapped in the city of pure sexy evil? And if I am writing things that strike that nerve in myself, even more subtly, is my writing going to be caught out as the cheesy fantasy-fulfillment that it is?

Then I take deep breaths and remind myself that people keep watching Flash Gordon and Barbarella, so apparently the Id still sells.
gement: (Default)
For those of you who are familiar with The Artist's Way, I don't have to explain Reading Deprivation Week. For the rest of y'all, the idea is to cut out your biggest mind-blanking-time-frittering-filling-yourself-with-the-unimportant activity for a week to find out what ELSE is going on in your brain. Which is, the author theorizes for the majority of people who read books on increasing one's creativite output, reading.

I have previously given up watching tv or playing computer solitaire games (including all other minigames of the Pop Cap/Big Fish varieties (Hi, [livejournal.com profile] tithonium and [livejournal.com profile] niac! Hi, [livejournal.com profile] spaced!)). I have even given up email and LJ for a week.

So these days I consider it a triumph that I'm checking LJ and email within a week, the only other reading I do is the comics page of the paper while I wait for my toast to pop at work, I'm not addicted to any chat interfaces or online games, I'm having trouble getting around to watching seasons of Doctor Who and Torchwood that were HANDED to me as a gift, and I only play minigames when my internet is down and I'm hoping it will come back up in a minute to check my wiki.

What am I doing? I'm thinking about my book. All the time. I mean all the time. I'm checking for new comments again on my wiki, or re-reading my own work obsessively, or I'm replaying scenes in my head. To the exclusion of doing else with my bus ride time or most of my other down cycles.

This is clearly not the best use of my creative time, as I'm not even making up much new stuff these days. Or months, in fact. I would like to be spending that energy viciously editing, or voraciously reading period source material and books on how to write descriptions that don't suck.

Or possibly doing my laundry. That situation's getting a bit urgent. More on that next post.

So how do I do Reading Deprivation Week when what I'm mindlessly reading is my own creative output and taking the book away doesn't help because I have it memorized?
gement: (Default)
Okay, this is really silly, but I've written one utterly gruesome story that, until yesterday, only the supremely unsquickable [livejournal.com profile] meowse had read. (I told [livejournal.com profile] passionandsoul and perhaps a couple others the premise, though.) I only gave myself permission to put it down on paper because I'd seen [livejournal.com profile] passionandsoul write something just as scary. But I still didn't feel entirely settled about it. Proud of it personally, but not sure what anyone else would think.

I have been cringing internally, waiting for my other readers to hit that story and say something like, "That was... different. Not my kink, and I'm afraid it weakens the rest with its overdramatic gruesomeness. Aside from these two lines of dialogue that might be good somewhere else, it should really go. Also, EW AND YOU SHOULD BE LOCKED UP AND I WILL HAVE NIGHTMARES AND EW!"

Yesterday, I got a comment on it. And it did not say that. And I am happy.

Cry havoc

Apr. 29th, 2008 10:52 am
gement: (Default)
Seven copies of my work handed out last night, and I have to put an electronic copy up on the (extremely protected) Yahoogroup fileshare for anyone who's coming next month but didn't come this month.

SO nervous. Too late to do anything about it. I'm on the hot seat at the May meeting. *jitter*

Given that they only meet once a month, I feel extraordinarily honored to get into the action immediately. The group coordinator actually apologized to me that we wouldn't have time to critique it last night, as someone else had already submitted work in advance. (I was boggled; the website made it clear that you couldn't get more than 3 pages critiqued unless you submitted it in advance, which seemed sensible to me, but apparently it's flexible.)

We sat for two hours talking about six poems, a couple of which were quite powerful. I learned a lot from watching the author react, both how to accept critique gracefully and certain mannerisms that I want to avoid. (She mostly modeled the former, but she was understandably nervous in many of the ways that I will certainly be nervous, leading to a bit of impulsive interrupting and disclaiming.)

When it's my turn, I'll probably make one big fluttering nervous disclaimer along the lines of, "I'm pretty confident about dialogue, but I have no formal training in how to make the surrounding words fit together, so I appreciate that they'll probably all have to be chopped around," before they start in on me. Then I can sit quietly and mightily resist the urge to say things like, "Oh, that, I know that part's weak, I'll change it right away!"

And it's a month away. Maybe I'll have gotten the disclaimer out of my system by then.

My impressions of the group: very welcoming, gentle but thorough critiquing, tasty pie. The group leader is cheerfully gregarious, which is part of the welcoming atmosphere.

My only complaint on that front is that it's a little difficult to get a word in edgewise, so I think there might be better group flow if she chose to wait until others had rung in before giving her critiques. Also, when we were supposed to be carefully reading and marking poems with our shiny red pens, she kept talking even after she rebuked herself. I recognize this as something I might well do if I were running the group, and I would find it difficult to correct in myself, so I'm certainly not spiting her for it.

The group currently meets once a month, but several of us asked why it wasn't more frequent, and the answer seems to be "tradition, which can be changed given sufficient interest." So that might be nifty.
gement: (Default)
I am going to the No Safewords Writers' Group tonight, armed with several manuscript-format copies of an 18-page short story. Which I will hand to people. People with pens, and opinions.

I decided to start with something from the middle of my writing, which stands alone, doesn't require excessive explanation, and is one of the stronger candidates for selling to a magazine if the novel doesn't survive or this scene is cut from it. It's a story that I am confident is sexy and solidly written, with no weird pronoun contortions or point-of-view shifts.

When I see how I react to people's critiques on this fairly safe territory, then we can start talking about The Goddamn Quest (which I continue to be convinced should Just Go, but I don't know how to get rid of it without shaking the foundation of the rest).

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...
gement: (Default)
The mind is not always sensible. All true fear is, at its heart, the fear of death. May I show you something? -- Aldo, which is to say, me.[1]

Clarification: The following is not intended as a slight to my wonderful current readers. If anything, I am attempting to take an undue and unreciprocated burden off them so they can just enjoy reading it and talk to me about themes.

I need to find a critique group. I am not sure what that will look like. It might be a fan-based group that specializes in naughty slash. It might be a romance writer's group. The basic requirements are:

1) Has members who have experience with fixing and smoothing dumb persistent writing problems and can suggest fixes. (Specifically, won't just give me a thumbs up, but won't just tell me "it's wrong. Fix it somehow.")
2) Will not lynch me for writing the kink and the gay sex.
3) Will not lynch me for writing something that is not commercially publishable or doesn't necessarily fit into a tidy genre box or isn't perfectly historically accurate.
4) Will not lynch me for not having previous experience with critiquing the work of others.
5) Will not lynch me.

I'd prefer a group that meets at least occasionally in person in the Seattle area, and I'd very much like a group with at least one biomale in it who can call me on girls-writing-boys problems, but those are negotiable points.

Does anyone have any suggestions on either specific groups or places to look for groups? I've had a suggestion for Hugo House and for the No Safewords group, and I wondered if anyone had experience with either to tell me if I will get what I need in either place.

[1] For those of you who have read the relevant passage, I would pay a great deal for that kind of life coaching. A very great deal.
gement: (Default)
Since I last posted, just 15 days shy of a year ago today, I have taken a number of exciting and fulfilling classes, graduated from library school with a perfect attendance record, done an internship with a non-profit that promotes the humanities in everyday life, written most of a dirty novel, gotten a second boyfriend who is meeting a lot of my visceral needs, and become gainfully employed in my chosen profession. (No, I'm not working in a library, but I'm doing data cleaning in a company that provides support services for libraries.)

I feel awkwardly like everything I do is unfinished. I still haven't looked straight-on at my grade report for my last quarter of grad school, I left some very large loose ends at the non-profit internship, I gave test decks of cards for my math game to teachers but then haven't checked back in with them.

I'm managing to stay focused on the writing, but I'm getting to the point where I need to do much more aggressive editing, and I think I need to define a victory condition. "I can rest on my laurels if I..."

At the moment, I think the victory condition may be:
1) Learn enough about how things get published to find out if all or part of my work is commercially publishable.
1a) If it is, make at least three serious attempts to get all or part of it commercially published.
2) If it is not, or if I get tired of rejection slips, self-publish online in a respectable format on a server that I pay for or otherwise control.

For those of you who already have logins to my writing wiki, hey! Come say hi! And if you've been browsing without telling me, comment, you bastards! For those of you who don't yet have logins, if you're interested in giving substantive feedback on some 1780's very gay vampire smut, give a holler. (Edit: 1780's, not 1880's. Pre-Rev Europe, not Victoriana.)

Special thanks to [livejournal.com profile] maribou and [livejournal.com profile] memegarden, the first two winners of the "Actually leaving comments in the wiki" award, to [livejournal.com profile] capnexposition and [livejournal.com profile] hesperide for feeding me and talking about my work in person, and [livejournal.com profile] meowse for reading every single word of my work out loud to me and very patiently not reading ahead.

Regarding staying focused on my writing, it looks suspiciously like the pattern when I am obsessed with any other piece of media. It's just harder because I can't talk about it with very many people, because a lot of people know from Xander and Willow, but not a lot of people can appreciate a conversation about Aldo, because they haven't met him. But just so you know, I'm a little obsessed, and my postings may reflect that. Brace yourselves.

I may still be sporadic. I'm dealing with serious social anxiety and not checking email often. I could use some help staying in touch. Phone calls help.

Profile

gement: (Default)
gement

October 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
1011121314 1516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 04:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios