![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
gementYesterday I had one of those hallucinatory insights brought on by 6 hours of sorting shelves.
Dewey doesn't make clumps of unsorted books. IMPRECISE LIBRARIANS do that. Every book has a Dewey number out to five places. Having now seen the "Children's Crafts", "Mythology", and "Cookbooks" digits sorely abused now, I have a better idea of how I would run things in my perfect little world.
1) There is never a reason to truncate to a whole number. Always include at least one decimal place.
2) If a topic has a chance of being even reasonably popular, go ahead and put two places. It won't hurt anything, really. If the cookbooks even had two places, I probably wouldn't be ranting right now.
3) If you know you're heading into territory like "Cookbooks," "Cute Fuzzy Animals," or "Mythology," USE THREE PLACES SO IT'S NOT MEANINGLESSLY SORTED BY AUTHOR.
The rule of thumb for my system is, if you get ten books with an identical number, you should probably label all subsequent books from that area with an extra decimal place and, if you have time, relabel those ten to match.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
cow, I take back what I said about Dewey before. I would now be happy to label your collection in either system. For unspeakably large collections, LC is probably still better, but at this point I would need to see a demonstration of that.
Oh, and I have now officially shelf-read (reordered) the library's ENTIRE juvenile section, from Fic A through Biography Z. Go me.
Dewey doesn't make clumps of unsorted books. IMPRECISE LIBRARIANS do that. Every book has a Dewey number out to five places. Having now seen the "Children's Crafts", "Mythology", and "Cookbooks" digits sorely abused now, I have a better idea of how I would run things in my perfect little world.
1) There is never a reason to truncate to a whole number. Always include at least one decimal place.
2) If a topic has a chance of being even reasonably popular, go ahead and put two places. It won't hurt anything, really. If the cookbooks even had two places, I probably wouldn't be ranting right now.
3) If you know you're heading into territory like "Cookbooks," "Cute Fuzzy Animals," or "Mythology," USE THREE PLACES SO IT'S NOT MEANINGLESSLY SORTED BY AUTHOR.
The rule of thumb for my system is, if you get ten books with an identical number, you should probably label all subsequent books from that area with an extra decimal place and, if you have time, relabel those ten to match.
cow, I take back what I said about Dewey before. I would now be happy to label your collection in either system. For unspeakably large collections, LC is probably still better, but at this point I would need to see a demonstration of that.Oh, and I have now officially shelf-read (reordered) the library's ENTIRE juvenile section, from Fic A through Biography Z. Go me.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-03-19 10:28 am (UTC)I really like Fiction having actual numbers and such. I can look up some Zelazny book I've never read and go to some little corner of the fifth floor and boom, all sorts of cool stuff.
Maybe I should get some books. I'm in front of the library right now. Muhuhua.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-19 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-19 11:53 am (UTC)I guess those were just wishful memory-rewrite.
PS 3550 to PS 3599 or something like that is all just 'American Fiction'. (But Gibson's Canadian and the Toronto Public Library has him under Canadian Fiction... oh well.)
The full number of The Difference Engine is PS 3557 I2264 D54 1996, and I thought that maybe 'I2264' was a subclassification for 'really good cyberpunky SF', but .. it's just LC-code for 'Gibson'.
.... Which means the entire section is actually just generic fiction, alphabetized.
So it's not much better than Dewey. But letters are a little less confusing than numbers sometimes. Sure makes the new kids confused, though... but having cute first-years say "umm do you know.. how.. to umm.. find .. books?" is kind of fun.